Skip to main content

Table 1 Association strengths between binary features and target outcomes using Cramer’s V

From: In vivo electrophysiology recordings and computational modeling can predict octopus arm movement

Categorical Variables

Binary Target (Cramér's V Value)

Multi-Class Target (Cramér's V Value)

Stimulation: ANC

0.175

0.177

Stimulation: Tactile, distal part

0.435

0.500

Stimulation: Tactile, proximal part

0.287

0.373

  1. The Cramer’s V analysis demonstrates the varying strengths of association, between the stimulation location features and the movement outcome. Results demonstrate that the tactile, distal location of stimulation feature, had higher association for both binary-class and multi-class outcomes, compared to ANC and tactile, proximal part features
Back to article page

Bioelectronic Medicine

ISSN: 2332-8886