From: Trigeminal nerve stimulation: a current state-of-the-art review
Stimulation Method and Target | Species | Stimulation Parameters | Effect | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Electrical, Distal Trigeminal Ganglion | 15 isolated canine brains | 50 Hz 10 V 1 ms PW 20 ms train | ↑ CBF; ↓CVR ↑ Cerebral oxygen consumption | Lang and Zimmer 1974 | |
Electrical, Trigeminal Ganglion | Adult cats | 10 Hz 0.5 mA 0.25 ms PW | ↑ CBF in the frontal and parietal cortex Neurally controlled cortical vasodilation | Goadsby and Duckworth 1987 | |
Male Wistar rats | 5Â Hz 10Â V 1Â ms PW 30Â s continuous | Small increase in MAP and HR | Escott et al. 1995 | ||
Cats | 0.5 – 20 Hz 0.25 mA 0.25 ms PW 30 s continuous | ↓ CVR in the parietal cortex ↓ BP | Goadsby et al. 1997 | ||
Male Sprague–Dawley rats | 1 mA 200 ms cycle 5 ms width 30 min continuous | ↑ Plasma and cortical CGRP, PACAP, VIP, NPY, nociceptin | Guo et al. 2021 | ||
Invasive Electrical, Right Nasociliary Nerve | Adult Sprague–Dawley rats | 3 – 60 Hz 5 V 0.5 ms PW 90 s continuous | ↑ CBF as a function of frequency in the parietal cortex | Suzuki et al. 1990 | |
Non- Invasive Electrical, Nasociliary Nerve | New Zealand albino rabbits of both sexes | 10 Hz 5 V 0.5 ms PW 90 s continuous | ↑ CBF as a function of voltage (1-5 V) in the premotor cortex | Gurelik et al. 2004 | |
Percutaneous Electrical, Infraorbital Nerve | Male Sprague–Dawley rats | 2 Hz 1.2 mA 1 ms PW 4 min continuous | ↑ CBF in the barrel cortex Pronounced increase in K1 and K2 of the H215O, which correlates to ↑ CBF | Weber et al. 2003 | |
15 male Sprague–Dawley rats | 0.25—12 Hz 2 mA 0.1 ms PW | ↑ CBF as a function of frequency (up to 3 Hz) in the barrel cortex Activation of somatosensory barrel field cortex above .5 Hz Blood oxygen response reached maximum at 1 Hz and/or 1.3 mA ↓ BP above 3 mA | Just et al. 2010 | ||
Male Sprague–Dawley rats | 50 Hz 0.25 – 5 V .75 ms PW Rectangular biphasic pulses | ↓ HR; ↑ MAP; ↓SPO2; ↑ rCBF; ↓ CVR; ↑ PbrO2 ↓RR; Brainstem Fos activation | Shah et al. 2020 | ||
Male Sprague–Dawley rats | 133 Hz 0.25 – 3 V 1 ms PW Rectangular biphasic pulses 60 s continuous | ↑ CBF; ↓ CVR; ↑ MAP; ↑ CGRP; ↑ CPP | |||
Infraorbital nerve, electrical acupuncture | 12-week old Sprague–Dawley Rats | 2/100 Hz 3 mA 6 s continuous for 40 min | ↑ BBB permeability ↓ Occludin ↑ Calcium wave events with ↑ intensity | Gong et al. 2022 | |
Peripheral trigeminal nerve stimulation | Adult female Wistar rats | 5 Hz 0.05 mA 1 ms PW 10 s continuous | 1 Hz 1—6 mA 0.1 ms PW | Both Settings: ↑ CBF ↑ Blood mean velocity | Li et al. 2009 |
Maxillary and mandibular branches | Adult female and male rats | 0.05—1.5 mA 0.2 ms PW Pseudorandom intervals of 3-4 s apart with different combinations | Both the Ion and SoN can be accessed through a single incision, and both can be accessed, interfaced, and engaged in rats | Dingle et al. 2019 | |
Invasive Electrical, cut end of Lingual Nerve | Adult cats | 10 Hz 30 V 2 ms PW 20 s continuous |  ↔ CBF; ↑ CCA BF | Sato et al. 1997 | |
Adult male Wistar rats | 1 – 30 Hz 1 – 30 V 2 ms PW 20 s continuous | ↑ ICABF and LBF | Ishii et al. 2014 |